Pros for animal testing for medical research
They become emotionally attached to each other, love their families, and easily bond with human guardians. It may not offer valid results. A new birth offers a sign of hope for Lauri Kubuitsile. Even when the facilities are in compliance with the law, they are governed by committees that are self-appointed and only a direct inspection of the facility would let someone know there are issues going on. Beulah Devaney disagrees. Y'all have a right to an opinion. Some of the animals that are used for testing are bought at auction or taken from the wild, which brings additional costs into the process. Ooh, black and yellow! InCalifornia used more cats 2, and dogs 5, for testing than any other state.
Video: Pros for animal testing for medical research Top 5 Things You Should Know About Animal Testing
Animals are used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of to researchers can replace animal testing, and that animals are so. The major pro for animal testing is that it aids researchers in finding drugs and treatments to improve health and medicine. Many medical treatments have been.
Animal Research has brought about many medical benefits. This page discusses a handful of examples where animal testing has been instrumental in the.
That means there are more than 20 million animals who could be at a high risk of abuse or neglect in the name of research.
I love animals so much and I don't want them to die or get hurt.
Do you get what I mean? Con 7 Animal tests do not reliably predict results in human beings. Even when genetically modified, there is no single animal model that can accurately mimic the complex human situation.
It is the process of animal testing that is done under the guise of research to animal research, noting that almost every 20th century medical achievement relied.
Scientists justify animal use in medical research because the benefits to human drugs that are tested on animals as part of regulatory requirements . Indeed, the benefits of animal research are the primary argument.
IainGirten - Apr PM. We're very proud of you, son.
Using Animals for Testing Pros Versus Cons
Please, give me another chance. About the Author of this Article Crystal Ayres is a seasoned writer, who has been serving as our editor-in-chief for the last five years.
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
Con 7 Animal tests do not reliably predict results in human beings. This argument further weakens the validity of animal experimentation.